<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Young Israel Says Freedom of Worship at the Western Wall Must Remain Sancrosanct	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://womenforthewall.org/2013/06/young-israel-says-freedom-of-worship-at-the-western-wall-must-remain-sancrosanct/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://womenforthewall.org/2013/06/young-israel-says-freedom-of-worship-at-the-western-wall-must-remain-sancrosanct/</link>
	<description>Preserving the Traditional Sanctity of the Western Wall.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 23:10:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: rd		</title>
		<link>https://womenforthewall.org/2013/06/young-israel-says-freedom-of-worship-at-the-western-wall-must-remain-sancrosanct/#comment-2076</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rd]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 23:10:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://womenforthewall.org/?p=400#comment-2076</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[judaism&#039;s &quot;holiest site&quot; is above the kotel, it is har habayit, the temple mount.  the kotel is indeed a holy place for us.  but that is only until we return to our temple on the &quot;temple mount&quot; (hel-loo).

also, re &quot;freedom&quot; of worship.. it is essential, as the article states that people are not &quot;disruptive or provocative&quot;.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>judaism&#8217;s &#8220;holiest site&#8221; is above the kotel, it is har habayit, the temple mount.  the kotel is indeed a holy place for us.  but that is only until we return to our temple on the &#8220;temple mount&#8221; (hel-loo).</p>
<p>also, re &#8220;freedom&#8221; of worship.. it is essential, as the article states that people are not &#8220;disruptive or provocative&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
